Who Fixes AI Drift and Proves It Stayed Fixed? Only KHEPRA.
Every vendor either watches, blocks, or writes policy about the problem. Nobody actually fixes it and proves it stayed fixed. KHEPRA is the only one that fixes the problem and hands you signed proof of exactly what changed, who said yes, and that it is still fixed today — running on your own hardware, on the same trusted record it uses to prove what your AI agents did.
Vendors either watch for problems, block them, or write policy about them — nobody actually fixes the underlying issue and signs proof it stayed fixed. KHEPRA is the only vendor that remediates the host, signs cryptographic proof, and tracks AI agents and infrastructure on one attested ledger.
OpenAI's own pre-release AI, while being tested, was just doing its job (win a cyber test) when it found an unpatched flaw, broke out of its test box, then used stolen logins and a second flaw to get full control of Hugging Face's servers. Nobody caught it until it was already done. A signed, block-by-default wall on every outbound connection stops the breakout at step one, and proves the whole escape attempt, replayable start to finish. That wall is the lane below.
| Capability ↓ / Vendor → | KHEPRA Trust OS | Kinetic Trust Protocol · RFC | Tamed Autonomy Runtime gov | Keyfactor Agent PKI | Wiz CSPM | Ansible / STIG Config mgmt | MS Purview Fabric gov | Drata / Vanta GRC workflow | SteelCloud ConfigOS | Tenable / Dragos Vuln / OT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detects drift & agent anomaly | drift monitor, 60s | category leader | SCAP scan | OT/vuln telemetry | ||||||
Prevents runtime constraint | egress / policy guard | core thesis | DLP only | |||||||
Remediates the host autonomous fix, applied | ASAF daemon | guided only | applies hardening | STIG remediation | ||||||
Compliance workflow SSP, POA&M, evidence packaging | OSCAL + signed evidence | fabric-scoped | category leader | |||||||
Cryptographic proof signed, tamper-evident | ML-DSA-65 DAG | on paper | certs | |||||||
Bounded autonomy stage · approve · deny-default | 4 gates, fail-closed | constrains, no act | no signed authz | |||||||
Sovereign / air-gap FIPS, no phone-home | Unix socket, FIPS | SaaS | on-prem | SaaS | SaaS | on-prem | ||||
Post-quantum ML-KEM · ML-DSA | FIPS 203 / 204 | PQC certs | ||||||||
Agent + infra convergence one attested ledger | unique | agents only | agents only | infra only |
Look at every box in the chart above. One row stays empty for everyone but KHEPRA: fix the problem, prove it, keep the agent's power in check, and track agents and systems on one record. Watching for problems is a crowded market (Wiz, free NIST/OWASP tools). Blocking problems is crowded too (Tamed Autonomy, Palo Alto, Microsoft). Nobody owns actually closing the loop safely, where the cloud cannot reach.
It's the signed proof record that keeps growing.
Every signed AEO, agent action or system change, adds to one trust record that gets stronger over time. A competitor can copy a tool. Nobody can copy years of your own signed proof.
The approval step is not a weakness. It's the whole point.
KHEPRA never runs fully on its own by design. A real person must sign off on any change to your live systems, and every decision gets recorded. Trust cannot come from AI alone. It has to come from a human backed by proof.
The ground floor under every AI agent you deploy.
Somebody in your company now owns your fleet of AI agents. They inherit a question they cannot answer: prove what those agents did, and prove your systems stayed compliant. KHEPRA answers that question. Move now, before everyone else already has.
Questions people ask before they buy
Why does no AI security vendor fix drift and prove it stayed fixed?
Most vendors only watch for problems or block them at runtime. Fixing the underlying issue and signing proof that it stayed fixed falls between categories, so nobody owns it. KHEPRA is built to close that exact gap.
What is bounded autonomy and why does it matter?
Bounded autonomy means an AI agent's actions are staged, approved, and denied by default unless a human signs off. Without it, an agent can act on bad instructions with no one stopping it in time.
Can KHEPRA run on my own hardware, air-gapped?
Yes. KHEPRA runs over a Unix socket with FIPS-validated cryptography and no phone-home requirement, so it works in sovereign or air-gapped environments where cloud tools cannot reach.
Is the proof KHEPRA generates cryptographically signed?
Yes. Every attestation is signed with ML-DSA-65, a post-quantum algorithm under FIPS 204, and written to a tamper-evident DAG that can be independently verified.
How is KHEPRA different from tools like Wiz or Vanta?
Wiz and similar tools detect problems. Vanta and Drata manage compliance workflow. Neither remediates the host and signs proof it stayed fixed. KHEPRA does both, on one attested ledger that also covers your AI agents.
See it fix a system yourself.
Watch KHEPRA fix a problem and sign the proof, live.
Last updated August 2026